| I was literally about to get the model to test. Though I'm impressed by how long of a way llms in general have came in the last 3 years [link] [comments] |
Here’s something that might surprise you — despite how far large language models (LLMs) have come over the past three years, according to /u/PriceOfGoods on Reddit, they’re still painfully fragile. You'd think that with all the progress, these models would be closer to human-like understanding, but the truth is, they often stumble at the simplest tasks. The author was just about to test a new model when he realized how easily it could go wrong, highlighting just how much basic reasoning still trips up AI. It’s a stark reminder that rapid advancements don’t mean the tech is actually reliable yet. As /u/PriceOfGoods points out, the tragedy isn’t just in these models failing — they’re giving a false sense of confidence, making us overestimate what AI can really do. So, the key takeaway? The real game-changer isn’t just speed of development, but how we manage expectations around AI’s true capabilities — because right now, they’re still far from perfect.
| I was literally about to get the model to test. Though I'm impressed by how long of a way llms in general have came in the last 3 years [link] [comments] |
| I was literally about to get the model to test. Though I'm impressed by how long of a way llms in general have came in the last 3 years [link] [comments] |