EPA kills foundation of greenhouse gas regulations

February 13, 2026
EPA kills foundation of greenhouse gas regulations

Here's something surprising — your ability to fight climate change might have just taken a huge hit. The EPA, under the Trump administration, announced it’s revoking the 'endangerment finding' — that key analysis from 2007 that says greenhouse gases pose a threat to public health. According to John Timmer writing in Technology, this move effectively weakens the legal basis for regulating emissions from cars, power plants, and industry. Now, here’s where it gets interesting: even though it was only a starting point, this finding has been the backbone of climate regulation for nearly two decades. The first Trump team left it in place because challenging the science was a lost cause — scientists agree human activity drives climate change. But in the second Trump term, they tried to question that science head-on, gathering contrarians to produce a report — yet it fell flat, both scientifically and legally. So what does this actually mean for ongoing climate efforts? Well, it could open the door for less regulation, and honestly, that’s a concerning turn for anyone worried about the planet’s future.

In a widely expected move, the Environmental Protection Agency has announced that it is revoking an analysis of greenhouse gases that laid the foundation for regulating their emissions by cars, power plants, and industrial sources. The analysis, called an endangerment finding, was initially ordered by the US Supreme Court in 2007 and completed during the Obama administration; it has, in theory, served as the basis of all government regulations of carbon dioxide emissions since.

In practice, lawsuits and policy changes between Democratic and Republican administrations have meant it has had little impact. In fact, the first Trump administration left the endangerment finding in place, deciding it was easier to respond to it with weak regulations than it was to challenge its scientific foundations, given the strength of the evidence for human-driven climate change.

Legal tactics

The second Trump administration, however, was prepared to tackle the science head-on, gathering a group of contrarians to write a report questioning that evidence. It did not go well, either scientifically or legally.

Read full article

Comments

Audio Transcript

In a widely expected move, the Environmental Protection Agency has announced that it is revoking an analysis of greenhouse gases that laid the foundation for regulating their emissions by cars, power plants, and industrial sources. The analysis, called an endangerment finding, was initially ordered by the US Supreme Court in 2007 and completed during the Obama administration; it has, in theory, served as the basis of all government regulations of carbon dioxide emissions since.

In practice, lawsuits and policy changes between Democratic and Republican administrations have meant it has had little impact. In fact, the first Trump administration left the endangerment finding in place, deciding it was easier to respond to it with weak regulations than it was to challenge its scientific foundations, given the strength of the evidence for human-driven climate change.

Legal tactics

The second Trump administration, however, was prepared to tackle the science head-on, gathering a group of contrarians to write a report questioning that evidence. It did not go well, either scientifically or legally.

Read full article

Comments

0:00/0:00
EPA kills foundation of greenhouse gas regulations | Speasy