What's the best cabin layout for aircraft evacuation?

April 1, 2026

Ever wonder if airplane evacuations could be faster? Jennifer Ouellette reports that the FAA’s 90-second rule might be a stretch, especially with more elderly passengers who need extra time. A new study shows simulations often take longer, raising safety questions. But here’s where it gets interesting — scientists have been digging into how we board planes, too. Back in 2011, physicist Jason Steffen applied a clever twist to the boarding process, using optimization methods from the traveling salesman problem. Turns out, the popular back-to-front method isn’t just slow — it's the worst. Instead, Steffen’s ‘wave’ boarding, which gets multiple people seated at the same time, nearly doubles the speed, according to field tests. Jennifer Ouellette points out that this idea of parallelism — having everyone move efficiently — could also influence how cabins are designed for quick evacuations. So what’s the takeaway? Rethinking both boarding and cabin layout might be key to saving precious seconds when it really counts.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires that, in the event of an emergency, all airplane passengers must be able to evacuate any aircraft within a 90-second window. But is that a realistic requirement, particularly given the increasing number of elderly passengers who might need more time and assistance? According to a new paper published in the journal AIP Advances, it is not. Various simulated scenarios showed evacuation times significantly higher than the 90-second requirement.

This isn't the first time scientists have puzzled over this kind of optimization problem. Back in 2011, Jason Steffen, now a physicist at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, became intrigued by the question of the most efficient boarding method; he applied the same optimization routine used to solve the famous traveling salesman problem to airline boarding strategies. Steffen fully expected that boarding from the back to the front would be the most efficient strategy and was surprised when his results showed that strategy was actually the least efficient.

The most efficient, aka the “Steffen method,” has the passengers board in a series of waves. Field tests bore out the results, showing that Steffen’s method was almost twice as fast as boarding back-to-front or rotating blocks of rows and 20–30 percent faster than random boarding. The key is parallelism: The ideal scenario is having more than one person sitting down at the same time.

Read full article

Comments

Audio Transcript

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires that, in the event of an emergency, all airplane passengers must be able to evacuate any aircraft within a 90-second window. But is that a realistic requirement, particularly given the increasing number of elderly passengers who might need more time and assistance? According to a new paper published in the journal AIP Advances, it is not. Various simulated scenarios showed evacuation times significantly higher than the 90-second requirement.

This isn't the first time scientists have puzzled over this kind of optimization problem. Back in 2011, Jason Steffen, now a physicist at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, became intrigued by the question of the most efficient boarding method; he applied the same optimization routine used to solve the famous traveling salesman problem to airline boarding strategies. Steffen fully expected that boarding from the back to the front would be the most efficient strategy and was surprised when his results showed that strategy was actually the least efficient.

The most efficient, aka the “Steffen method,” has the passengers board in a series of waves. Field tests bore out the results, showing that Steffen’s method was almost twice as fast as boarding back-to-front or rotating blocks of rows and 20–30 percent faster than random boarding. The key is parallelism: The ideal scenario is having more than one person sitting down at the same time.

Read full article

Comments

0:00/0:00