So, here’s something that’ll make you raise an eyebrow — federal cybersecurity experts called Microsoft’s cloud a 'pile of shit.' And get this — despite the harsh review in late 2024, the government still approved it. According to Renee Dudley, with research by Doris Burke, the internal report slammed Microsoft’s lack of clear security docs, leaving reviewers with zero confidence in its safety. Honestly, that’s a red flag. But here’s where it gets wild — despite the clear issues, government officials went ahead and gave it the green light anyway. It’s like knowing a car’s got a terrible safety record but still buying it. So what does this actually mean for you? It highlights how sometimes, organizations prioritize quick approvals over real security — something to keep in mind when dealing with big tech. And honestly, it raises questions about how much oversight really happens behind closed doors. The story from Dudley and Burke reminds us that even when things look bad, decision-makers might still move forward — sometimes at a serious cost.
In late 2024, the federal government’s cybersecurity evaluators rendered a troubling verdict on one of Microsoft’s biggest cloud computing offerings.
The tech giant’s “lack of proper detailed security documentation” left reviewers with a “lack of confidence in assessing the system’s overall security posture,” according to an internal government report reviewed by ProPublica.
Or, as one member of the team put it: “The package is a pile of shit.”
In late 2024, the federal government’s cybersecurity evaluators rendered a troubling verdict on one of Microsoft’s biggest cloud computing offerings.
The tech giant’s “lack of proper detailed security documentation” left reviewers with a “lack of confidence in assessing the system’s overall security posture,” according to an internal government report reviewed by ProPublica.
Or, as one member of the team put it: “The package is a pile of shit.”