At NIH, a power struggle over institute directorships deepens

February 2, 2026
At NIH, a power struggle over institute directorships deepens

Here's something that might surprise you — at NIH, there's a serious power struggle brewing over who gets to lead the big research institutes. When a new president takes office, they fill thousands of federal jobs, but science agencies like NIH are a bit different. According to Michael Schulson writing in Undark, many top roles — think institute directors — are often filled with little White House or Congress input. That’s because these leaders hold massive budgets and set research directions, and many believe scientists should run the show without political meddling. But now, Schulson reports, tensions are rising. Some officials want more political influence, arguing it could align research more with national priorities. Others push back, saying that politicizing these roles risks undermining scientific independence. So, what does this actually mean for the future of research? Well, the clash over control isn’t just about power — it’s about how science shapes policy and innovation in America. Keep an eye on this space. It’s getting more heated, and the stakes are huge.

When a new presidential administration comes in, it is responsible for filling around 4,000 jobs sprinkled across the federal government’s vast bureaucracy. These political appointees help carry out the president’s agenda, and, at least in theory, make government agencies responsive to elected officials.

Some of these roles—the secretary of state, for example—are well-known. Others, such as the deputy assistant secretary for textiles, consumer goods, materials, critical minerals & metals industry & analysis, are more obscure.

Historically, science agencies like NASA or the National Institutes of Health tend to have fewer political appointees than many other parts of the federal government. Sometimes, very senior roles—with authority over billions of dollars of spending, and the power to shape entire fields of research—are filled without any direct input from the White House or Congress. The arrangement reflects a long-running argument that scientists should oversee the work of funding and conducting research with very little interference from political leaders.

Read full article

Comments

Audio Transcript

When a new presidential administration comes in, it is responsible for filling around 4,000 jobs sprinkled across the federal government’s vast bureaucracy. These political appointees help carry out the president’s agenda, and, at least in theory, make government agencies responsive to elected officials.

Some of these roles—the secretary of state, for example—are well-known. Others, such as the deputy assistant secretary for textiles, consumer goods, materials, critical minerals & metals industry & analysis, are more obscure.

Historically, science agencies like NASA or the National Institutes of Health tend to have fewer political appointees than many other parts of the federal government. Sometimes, very senior roles—with authority over billions of dollars of spending, and the power to shape entire fields of research—are filled without any direct input from the White House or Congress. The arrangement reflects a long-running argument that scientists should oversee the work of funding and conducting research with very little interference from political leaders.

Read full article

Comments

0:00/0:00
At NIH, a power struggle over institute directorships deepens | Speasy