Scientists hunting mammoth fossils found whales 400 km inland

February 18, 2026
Scientists hunting mammoth fossils found whales 400 km inland

Here's something that’ll make you do a double-take — scientists hunting for mammoth fossils in Alaska ended up with whale bones instead. Kiona N. Smith reports that University of Alaska paleontologist Matthew Wooller and his team radiocarbon-dated over 300 fossils, looking for the last woolly mammoths. But when they found two specimens that dated to just a few thousand years ago, they got a real surprise. Instead of mammoth bones, DNA tests revealed they were North Pacific right whales and minke whales — found 400 km inland, miles from any coast. Now, here’s where it gets interesting: this mix-up raises questions about how whale bones ended up so far from the ocean, and what it means for our understanding of Alaska’s ancient landscape. Wooller’s team thought they were closing in on recent mammoth survivors, but instead, they uncovered a whole new mystery about whale migrations and fossil record mix-ups. So if you thought fossil hunting was straightforward, think again — nature loves to keep us guessing. And honestly, this could rewrite some chapters of Arctic history.

In a recent study, University of Alaska Fairbanks paleontologist Matthew Wooller and his colleagues radiocarbon-dated what they thought were pieces of two mammoth vertebrae, only to get a whale of a surprise and a whole new mystery.

At first glance, it looked like Wooller and his colleagues might have found evidence that mammoths lived in central Alaska just 2,000 years ago. But ancient DNA revealed that two “mammoth” bones actually belonged to a North Pacific right whale and a minke whale—which raised a whole new set of questions. The team’s hunt for Alaska’s last mammoth had turned into an epic case of mistaken identity, starring two whale species and a mid-century fossil hunter.

The first signs that something was amiss”

The aptly named Wooller and his team have radiocarbon-dated more than 300 mammoth fossils over the last four years, looking for the last survivors of the wave of extinctions that wiped out woolly mammoths and other Pleistocene megafauna at the end of the last Ice Age. Two specimens stood out immediately. Based on the radiocarbon dates, two mammoths had lived near Fairbanks as recently as 2,800 and 1,900 years ago. Wooller and his colleagues had been looking for the youngest woolly mammoth specimen in Alaska but were completely mystified.

Read full article

Comments

Audio Transcript

In a recent study, University of Alaska Fairbanks paleontologist Matthew Wooller and his colleagues radiocarbon-dated what they thought were pieces of two mammoth vertebrae, only to get a whale of a surprise and a whole new mystery.

At first glance, it looked like Wooller and his colleagues might have found evidence that mammoths lived in central Alaska just 2,000 years ago. But ancient DNA revealed that two “mammoth” bones actually belonged to a North Pacific right whale and a minke whale—which raised a whole new set of questions. The team’s hunt for Alaska’s last mammoth had turned into an epic case of mistaken identity, starring two whale species and a mid-century fossil hunter.

The first signs that something was amiss”

The aptly named Wooller and his team have radiocarbon-dated more than 300 mammoth fossils over the last four years, looking for the last survivors of the wave of extinctions that wiped out woolly mammoths and other Pleistocene megafauna at the end of the last Ice Age. Two specimens stood out immediately. Based on the radiocarbon dates, two mammoths had lived near Fairbanks as recently as 2,800 and 1,900 years ago. Wooller and his colleagues had been looking for the youngest woolly mammoth specimen in Alaska but were completely mystified.

Read full article

Comments

0:00/0:00
Scientists hunting mammoth fossils found whales 400 km inland | Speasy