Judge doesn't trust DOJ with search of devices seized from Wash. Post reporter

February 26, 2026
Judge doesn't trust DOJ with search of devices seized from Wash. Post reporter

Here's something that caught my attention — a federal judge just put a big pause on the DOJ’s ability to search devices seized from a Washington Post reporter. So, six weeks after the FBI swooped in and took Hannah Natanson’s phone, laptop, and watch at her Virginia home, a magistrate judge, William Porter, decided the government can't be trusted to do the search alone. According to Jon Brodkin in TechCrunch, the judge criticized prosecutors for not including key details in the warrant, especially about a 1980 law protecting journalists’ work. Now, Porter has ordered a court-led process to limit the search to materials relevant to a possible leak case — and he even rolled back the part of the warrant that let the feds open or review the seized data. But here’s the thing — this signals a major pushback against government overreach, especially when it comes to press freedom. As Brodkin reports, it’s a reminder that when it comes to journalists’ tools, independence and oversight matter more than ever.

A federal court will conduct a search of devices seized from a Washington Post reporter after a magistrate judge decided yesterday that the Department of Justice cannot be trusted to perform the search on its own.

US Magistrate Judge William Porter criticized government prosecutors for not including key information in a search warrant application. The court wasn't aware of a 1980 law that limits searches and seizures of journalists' work materials when it approved the warrant, Porter acknowledged.

The decision came six weeks after the FBI executed the search warrant at the Virginia home of reporter Hannah Natanson. Porter declined the Post and Natanson's request to return the devices immediately but decided on a court-led process to ensure that the search is limited to materials that may aid a criminal case against an alleged leaker who was in contact with Natanson. He also rescinded the portion of the search warrant that authorized the government to open, access, review, or otherwise examine the seized data.

Read full article

Comments

Audio Transcript

A federal court will conduct a search of devices seized from a Washington Post reporter after a magistrate judge decided yesterday that the Department of Justice cannot be trusted to perform the search on its own.

US Magistrate Judge William Porter criticized government prosecutors for not including key information in a search warrant application. The court wasn't aware of a 1980 law that limits searches and seizures of journalists' work materials when it approved the warrant, Porter acknowledged.

The decision came six weeks after the FBI executed the search warrant at the Virginia home of reporter Hannah Natanson. Porter declined the Post and Natanson's request to return the devices immediately but decided on a court-led process to ensure that the search is limited to materials that may aid a criminal case against an alleged leaker who was in contact with Natanson. He also rescinded the portion of the search warrant that authorized the government to open, access, review, or otherwise examine the seized data.

Read full article

Comments

0:00/0:00